Observe the table:
\Find the which type of variation.
\Case (i): Find direct variation or not.
\The tabular form is
\![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
Observe table:
\The quotients of does not same of the all table values.
The quotients are not constant.
\Therefore, the relation does not shows direct variation.
\Case (ii): Find inverse variation or not.
\The tabular form is
\![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
Observe table:
\The product of does not same of the all table values.
The products are constant.
\Therefore, the relation does not shows Inverse variation.
\Thus, the answer is neither direct nor indirect variation.
\The answer is neither direct nor indirect variation.