\"\"

\

(a)

\

Caluculate the \"\".

\

Let \"\", then \"\".

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\".

\

\"\"

\

(b)

\

Adjoint the first two columns to right of the \"\".

\

\"\"

\

Sum of the product along the indicated downward diagonals is

\

\"\".

\

Sum of the product along the indicated upward diagonals is

\

\"\".

\

Diffeerence between the sum of downward diagonals and sum of upward diagonals is

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\".

\

\"\"

\

(c)

\

Result of \"\" : By using technical method \"\".

\

Result of \"\" : By using diagonal method \"\".

\

Compare the results \"\" and \"\".

\

There is no change in the value of \"\" in both the cases.

\

\"\"

\

(d)

\

The general matrix is \"\".

\

Sum of the product along the indicated downward diagonals is

\

\"\".

\

Sum of the product along the indicated upward diagonals is

\

\"\".

\

Diffeerence between the sum of downward diagonals  and sum of upward diagonals is

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\".

\

\"\"

\

(e) No.

\

The method of finding the determinant of the \"\"matrix is lengthy process, hence it is not possible to find the determinant of the \"\"matrix using diagonal method.

\

Consider a \"\" matrix.

\

\"\"

\

\"\"

\

\"\".

\

\"\"

\

(a) \"\".

\

(b) \"\".

\

(c) same answers \"\" and \"\".

\

(d) \"\".

\

(e) No. Sample example \"\".