Observe the graph :
\The function has relative maxima at
.
The funcction has relative minima at
. It is also appears that
and
, so the conjecture that this function has no absolute extrema.
Support numerically :
\Construct the table of values.
\Choose -values on either side of the estimated
-value for each extremum, as well as one very large and one very small value for
.
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
![]() | \
Observe the above table :
\Because and
, there is a relative maximum in the interval
.The approximate value of this relative maximum is
.
Because and
, there is a relative minimum in the interval
.The approximate value of this relative minimum is
.
and
, which supports the conjecture that the function has no absolute extrema.
The relative maximum is at .
The relative minimum is at .